Feeder evidence
Send feeder photographs, a short running video, any nameplate or controller details, current settings and whether the issue appears from start-up or only after production is running.
Repair and upgrade
Use this guide to decide whether an existing feeder needs service work, tooling changes, control updates or a replacement system.
Repair and refurbishment searches usually come from production teams that already have a feeder but are seeing jams, inconsistent output, worn tracks or a changed component. The first step is to separate a repairable fault from a part-change or integration problem.
| Situation | Likely route to assess | Evidence to collect |
|---|---|---|
| Feeder worked previously but now jams or slows | Maintenance check, cleaning, controller setting, spring/drive review or worn tooling inspection. | Video of the fault, current settings, component batch, fill level and any recent line changes. |
| Component has changed shape, material or finish | Tooling alteration or new bowl/track route rather than a simple service visit. | Old and new samples, drawings, required orientation and acceptable changeover method. |
| Downstream machine now starves or floods | Sensor, track, accumulation, hopper or PLC-demand review. | Demand pattern, fault state, full-track signal, stop/start logic and discharge interface details. |
| Frequent marking, noise or static issues | Surface lining, part protection, feed setting, bowl loading and reject-route assessment. | Photographs of marked parts, material notes, cleaning method and production environment. |
| Machine is obsolete or has unsupported parts | Replacement feeder or controlled retrofit depending on risk, downtime and integration complexity. | Photos, manuals, wiring/control information, footprint and the required production window. |
The strongest repair enquiry gives Lancing the same evidence an engineer would need on site. A short video of the real fault is usually more useful than a written description alone.
Send feeder photographs, a short running video, any nameplate or controller details, current settings and whether the issue appears from start-up or only after production is running.
Send current parts, older parts if available, rejected parts, batch variation notes, material and surface finish. Many apparent feeder faults are caused by a changed component.
Confirm downstream machine type, discharge height, fault signals, track sensors, operator access and how much downtime is available for adjustment or replacement.
Sometimes. Refurbishment is more likely where the original part, required orientation and downstream interface are still broadly the same. Replacement becomes more likely when the part family, control requirement or mechanical handover has changed significantly.
No. Poor feed rate can be caused by drive tuning, bowl loading, worn tooling, changed component geometry, excessive reject rate, a blocked chute or the downstream machine holding the feeder back.
Check the real component samples, required orientation, reject route, available discharge height, changeover expectation and whether the existing bowl has enough space for the new tooling route.
Lancing can review the application information and advise on a practical route, but suitability depends on the condition, access, controls and whether replacement parts or safe modifications are feasible.
Send sample parts, drawings, required orientation, output target, discharge height and downstream machine details. Lancing can review the practical feeder route before quotation.